What's the Difference Between Godly Initiative and Fleshly Ambition?
posted on
November 24, 2009
in
Articles
–
Print this post
Peter the Apostle – Acts 1:15
By Floyd McClungPeter was by definition a leader who did not wait for someone else to lead. In Acts 1:15, there is an example of Peter taking initiative to find a replacement for Judas. Some would say that the man who replaced Judas, Matthias, was never heard of again, therefore it was wrong of Peter to take the lead the way he did. But that is an argument from silence. There is no basis of confirming that view in Scripture. What we do know from Scripture is that people who wait for others are not leaders, but followers. Peter demonstrated initiative. He was a leader. Initiative like what Peter had requires faith, foresight, risk, boldness, courage and the willingness to experience rejection.
Peter showed initiative when he stepped out of the boat and walked on water to Jesus. While others waited, Peter acted, and he experienced God. During his lifetime, he healed a lame men, brought the gospel to the Gentiles, and preached to multitudes. Why? Because Peter took initiative in making decisions. Initiative is the earmark of a true leader.
John Maxwell comments in The Maxwell Leadership Bible that it is easier to run from a challenge than to step out and take a risk (page 1085). Peter was the man who stepped out of the boat and walked on water. It’s true that he made big mistakes and sometimes acted or spoke before he thought things through, but at least he acted while others watched and waited. Jesus encouraged such initiative in Peter by affirming his faith: “Upon this rock”, Jesus said, “I will build my church”.
There is a huge difference between fleshly ambition and godly initiative. Fleshly ambition is based on an inner motivation to prove ourselves, to gain acceptance or approval, to avoid rejection and to maintain control. Fleshly ambition can be based on a performance mentality of "doing the right thing". However, one can be busy without being spiritual. Fleshly ambition may start off as godly initiative, but if one does not stay close to Jesus, what “begins in the Spirit can end in the flesh” (Galatians 3:3). Fleshly ambition can come from believing we have to make something happen, that we are responsible for getting things done or that we are responsible for taking care of people. Fleshly ambition is not always about trying to be famous; it’s more often about an unreasonable need to be responsible.
Godly initiative, on the other hand, is the fruit of responding to revelation from God about what He wants us to do, and then doing it in faith. Godly initiative is done in faith that God will move on the hearts of people to do their part. Godly initiative is born in faith as an act of obedience to God, and then trusting God in others. True enough, there are times when our motive is honorable but our behavior is in the flesh… our motives are right, but we try too hard to “get it right”. At it’s root, Godly initiative is motivated by trust: trust in God, trust in the holy Spirit to do what only He can do, and trust in others to listen and obey God. Fleshly ambition occurs when we try too hard: we end up micro-managing people and circumstances to make sure things are done right. Even though our hearts can be right right, our actions will be wrong not if we don’t act in faith.
Lack of initiative, or passivity, is a result of a low sense of security, a paralyzed will, believing lies about ourselves and God, poor self-esteem, and low self-confidence. Low self-confidence is more often low Holy Spirit-confidence.
When Peter got out of the boat and walked to Jesus on water (Matthew 14:29), he was taking initiative. When he did that, Peter showed these qualities of initiative:
- He knew what he wanted – to walk to Jesus
- He stirred himself to act – and before he could talk himself out of it, he did it
- He took risks – and he was willing to fail in front of others
- He made more mistakes by taking initiative – but he showed more faith and boldness
- He went with his gut instinct – and learned discernment on the journey
- S – Self-protection
- A – Avoidance of danger
- F – Financial security
- E – Escape from difficult circumstances
2 Comments
I think of this along th lines of:
What is being produced?
•More love for Christ or a departure from a simple, pure, devotion to Him?
•Someone's agenda or the purposes of God?
•Pride or humility?
•More love for the word of God or a bending toward intellectualism?
•More love for brothers and sisters or division, suspicion, jealousy, envy, or strife?
•Better relationship to authority or rejection, separation, and insecurity?
•More peace and purity or fear of man and moral uncertainty?
•Unity or disunity?
•More fear of God or just legalistic procedure?
While this list is not all-inclusive, you can pretty well get the idea that it is results that make the difference between manipulation and influence. Of course motive can also play a part, but because manipulation is closely linked to deception, most people do not see their own attempts to manipulate for what they really are. They may even think they are promoting God's agenda and forget that God is completely able to care for His own purposes.
Closely related to manipulation, the "Messiah Complex" says: "If it's going to be, it's up to me! No one else can take care of this situation like I can." Of course when you look at the Messiah Complex in the light of reason and truth, you see how ridiculous it really is, but when we are in deception and not trusting God or our brothers and sisters who are also fellow heirs of our sovereign Lord, pride and manipulation can do funny things to our thinking.
Valuable thoughts and advices. I read your topic with great interest.